Take Action
Course
Curriculum
Download Textbook
1. Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks
0.1
Preface
1.1
Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks
1.2
Malicious Use
1.3
AI Race
1.4
Organizational Risks
1.5
Rogue AIs
1.6
Discussion of Connections Between Risks
2. AI Fundamentals
2.1
AI Fundamentals
2.2
Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning
2.3
Deep Learning
2.4
Scaling Laws
2.5
Conclusion
3. Single Agent Safety
3.1
Single Agent Safety
3.2
Monitoring
3.3
Robustness
3.4
Alignment
3.5
Systemic Safety
3.6
Safety and General Capabilities
3.7
Conclusion
4. Safety Engineering
4.1
Safety Engineering
4.2
Risk Decomposition
4.3
Nines of Reliability
4.4
Safe Design Principles
4.5
Component Failure Accident Models and Methods
4.6
Systemic Factors
4.7
Tail Events and Black Swans
4.8
Conclusion
5. Complex Systems
5.1
Complex Systems
5.2
Introduction to Complex Systems
5.3
Complex Systems for AI Safety
5.4
Conclusion
6. Beneficial AI and Machine Ethics
6.1
Beneficial AI and Machine Ethics
6.2
Law
6.3
Fairness
6.4
The Economic Engine
6.5
Wellbeing
6.6
Preferences
6.7
Happiness
6.8
Social Welfare Functions
6.9
Moral Uncertainty
7. Collective Action Problems
7.1
Collective Action Problems
7.2
Game Theory
7.3
Cooperation
7.4
Conflict
7.5
Evolutionary Pressures
7.6
Conclusion
8. Governance
8.1
Governance
8.2
Timelines
8.3
Distribution
8.4
Compute Governance
8.5
Corporate Governance
8.6
National Governance
8.7
International Governance
8.8
Conclusion
9. Appendices
9.1
Acknowledgements
10.1
App. A: Normative Ethics
11.1
App. B: Utility Functions
12.1
App. C: Reinforcement Learning
13.1
App. D: Long-Tailed and Thin-Tailed Distributions
14.1
App. E: Evolutionary Game Theory
15.1
App. F: Other Cooperation Mechanisms
16.1
App. G: Intrasystem Conflict Causes
All
Section
Appendix
6.3

Fairness

AI is being used in many sensitive applications, and unfair AI systems can cause serious harm. Methods for improving AI fairness could mitigate these harms, but they require overcoming challenges in formalizing and implementing fairness.

No items found.

Review Questions

What is one limitation of using statistical parity as a fairness metric?

‍

Answer:

Statistical parity only considers overall prediction rates, not accuracy. So a model could satisfy statistical parity while still making inaccurate predictions that disadvantage certain groups.

View Answer
Hide Answer

Why can enforcing fairness reduce an AI model's accuracy?

‍

Answer:

Fairness constraints essentially make the modeling task more difficult by restricting the model. This can come at a cost to performance on the original predictive task.

View Answer
Hide Answer

How could social approaches help address unfairness beyond technical methods alone?

Answer:

Social approaches like stakeholder participation and anti-discrimination policies can tackle root causes of unfairness in data and systems. Technical tools alone often fail to address these systemic biases.

View Answer
Hide Answer
0.1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
8.7
8.8
9.1
10.1
11.1
12.1
13.1
14.1
15.1
16.1
Get Involved
CourseFacilitateTake ActionSubmit Feedback
Textbook Resources
Table of ContentsDownload TextbookContent for Curriculum
Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy

Cookies Notice: This website uses cookies to identify pages that are being used most frequently. This helps us analyze data about web page traffic and improve our website. We only use this information for the purpose of statistical analysis and then the data is removed from the system. We do not and will never sell user data. Read more about our cookie policy on our privacy policy. Please contact us if you have any questions.

© 2024 Center for AI Safety
Built by Osborn Design Works